Articles Posted in Automobile Accident

As the Baby Boomer generation continues to age, one thing is certain–the roads will be increasingly filled with older drivers. Currently, thirteen percent, or 34 million Americans, are over sixty-five years of age. That number is expected to increase by 60% over the next fifteen years. Based on these numbers, it is projected that one in five drivers will be 65 or older by 2025.

While the older drivers may have more experience on the road, they are also responsible for a disproportionate number of accidents. A report released by TRIP states that although drivers over 65 account for 8% of all miles driven, they are involved in at least 17% of all reported crashes.

North Carolina is towards the top of the list in multiple statistical categories pertaining to older drivers. The state is fourth in the nation in raw number of older drivers killed in car accidents and fifth in the number of accidents involving at least one driver over the age of 65. North Carolina is ranked ninth in the nation for number of older licensed drivers. Unsurprisingly, the number one state in many of these categories is Florida.

Older drivers are more susceptible to serious injury from car accidents for a number of reasons. First, age comes with increased physical frailty and related medical issues. These issues include slower reaction time, poorer eyesight, and reduced muscle dexterity. Furthermore, when such accidents happen, injuries tend to be more severe due to this increased frailty. TRIP singles out “safely moving through intersections” as especially hazardous for older drivers.

Despite these numbers, no one is suggesting that we revoke the licenses of all older drivers. One of the major determining factors in quality of life is mobility and to deny that to an ever-increasing proportion of the population could only lead to trouble. Rather, it is being suggested that steps be taken to make the roads safer for older drivers. Some of the more prominent suggestions include clearer signs with larger lettering, increased width of pavement markings, widening lanes, and brighter lighting.

Continue Reading

In driver’s ed most of us learned to follow a few simple rules before changing lanes: turn on your blinker, check your mirrors and check your blind spot. Only after these had been done is it safe to change lanes.

According to a new study by the Society of Automotive Engineers discussed on MSNBC.com, almost half of all drivers are getting that first, and arguably most crucial step, wrong. The study found that, when changing lanes, 48% of drivers either fail to engage their turn signals or forget to turn them off. When turning, the error rate drops considerably but still remains at a surprisingly high 25%.

Whatever the reason, forgetfulness, laziness or poor driver’s education, the signal errors are having a major impact on driving safety. According to the study, improper blinker use causes roughly 2 million traffic accidents every year. By comparison, distracted driving causes around 950,000 crashes each year.

Drivers who fail to use their turn signals properly might not think their mistake is a big deal, but the fact is that such a slip up puts everyone else on the road at risk. Even if an accident does not happen, drivers could still run into trouble with the law. After all, failing to signal a turn or a lane change is a crime and is treated as severely as speeding or running a red light.

The people at the Society of Automotive Engineers have come up with a novel and potentially useful solution to the problem. It’s called the “Smart Turn Signal,” the group claims it can go a long way to reducing the rate of car accidents across the nation’s roadways.

The “Smart Turn Signal” would automatically shut off a signal once a certain amount of time had passed. The device is also capable of being programmed to automatically turn off after detecting a lane change. Such a feature is similar to what happens now after drivers complete a turn.

Continue Reading

WBTV recently reported that two young children were killed after being struck by a Sears delivery truck in a fatal trucking accident in Charlotte, North Carolina. On Wednesday, February 22, 2012, police responded to the intersection of Shady Lane and West Tyvola Road after a harrowing accident. Two brother, Jeremy Brewton, 1, and Kadrien Pendergrass, 5, died from injuries they suffered after a Sears delivery truck barreled through the intersection. The delivery truck driver, Dirk Jerome Brown, has been arrested and charged criminally for the incident.

The children were walking with their father, who also had his infant daughter with him. He and his children were walking near the edge of the street, with the father pushing one stroller and Pendergrass, the 5-year-old, pushing the other stroller. The driver was trying to turn right onto West Tyvola Road when he hit the two boys and their father. The young boys were rushed to Carolinas Medical Center, but they were pronounced dead at the hospital. Thankfully, the father and his infant daughter were not hurt in the accident.

Sears released the following statement through its spokesperson, Kimberly Freely: “Our thoughts and prayers are with the family of these two children… We’ve asked our third party delivery company to fully cooperate with local authorities as they investigate this tragic accident.” Apparently Sears contracts with a third party for all of its delivery services. This may be an important aspect should the family of these young boys decide to pursue a civil action against the major corporation for their deaths.

This accident will definitely raise liability issues for the third party delivery company because Brown, the delivery driver, was an employee of the company. Under the doctrine of respondeat superior, an employer can be held vicariously liable for the negligence of its employees if: (1) the employee’s actions were authorized by the employer; (2) the employee’s actions were committed within the scope of and in furtherance of the employer’s business; or (3) the employee’s actions were later ratified by the employer. It is likely that Brown was on his way to a delivery or coming from a delivery when struck the two young boys, which would make it very possible that he was acting within the scope of his employment with the delivery company. As such, the delivery company may be vicariously liable for the wrongful death of the two brothers.

Continue Reading