Published on:

Supreme Court Comes Down On The Side of Nursing Homes

Charlotte Personal Injury Attorney Matt Arnold answers the question “What constitutes nursing home negligence?

 

The Supreme Court issued an important decision today impacting millions of families across the country. The Court decided to weigh into an issue that has generated increasing controversy over the past several years: arbitration agreements. After hearing the facts of the case, the Court chose to side with big business interests, in this case, the nursing home industry, over the individual families who seldom understand that these agreements exist to strip them of their rights.

 

Hospital-Bed-Charlotte-Injury-Lawyer-300x207The case was brought by two families from Kentucky against Kindred Healthcare, the company responsible for operating a nursing home located in Winchester, KY. The families had loved ones who were admitted several years ago for care. The families had powers of attorney agreements and signed the admissions paperwork on behalf of their loved ones. Included in the paperwork was what’s known as an arbitration agreement.

 

So what is an arbitration agreement? An arbitration agreement is a fairly short clause, usually only a paragraph or two, that says a person agrees to handle any future disputes that may arise through arbitration rather than in court. That means, if down the road something bad happens, you can’t sue, you have to instead take the issue to an arbitration body who will assign an expert to review the facts and issue a ruling. The person won’t be a judge and you’ll lose the rights that you would normally have in a courtroom. The virtue, at least for the nursing homes, is that it’s a much cheaper process. It’s also usually secret, meaning the nursing homes are shielded from the bad press that follows a public lawsuit.

 

In this case, something bad did in fact occur. Both of the families lost their loved ones, they argue, due to the negligence of the nursing home staff. Despite the arbitration agreement, the families sued anyway. The nursing home fought the case, claiming the agreement prevented the suit. The Kentucky Supreme Court wasn’t swayed and sided with the families. The Kentucky High Court ruled that the families had a “God-given” right to litigate their issues in court and that the arbitration agreement could not stand in the way of what is a fundamental constitutional right.

 

Kindred Healthcare appealed the ruling all the way to the Supreme Court and, unfortunately for the families, eventually won out. The Supreme Court issued a 7-1 decision saying that the Kentucky Supreme Court was unfairly targeting arbitration agreements and did not include any other types of contractual agreements as those that ran counter to supposed constitutional rights. The Court instead said that any attempt by the states to discriminate against arbitration agreements violates the Federal Arbitration Act and would not be tolerated.

 

Many were disappointed with the ruling, hoping that the Supreme Court would acknowledge the harm these kinds of arbitration agreements cause to families across the country. Instead, the Court followed precedent, relegating these families to the arbitration system rather than allowing them to have their day in court.

 

If you or someone close to you has been injured, contact an experienced personal injury attorney today who can help you receive the compensation to which you may be entitled. Contact Arnold & Smith, PLLC for a free consultation, call at 704-370-2828 or click here for additional resources.

 

About the Author

Matt Matthew Arnold is a Managing Member of Arnold & Smith, PLLC, where he focuses on the areas of family law, divorce, personal injury and wrongful death claims.

Mr. Arnold was raised in Charlotte, where he graduated from Providence Senior High School. He attended Belmont Abbey College, where he graduated cum laude, before attending law school at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill on a full academic scholarship.

A board-certified specialist in the practice of Family Law, Mr. Arnold is admitted to practice in all state courts in North Carolina, in the United States Federal Court for the Western District of North Carolina, in the North Carolina Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, and in the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia.

In his free time, Mr. Arnold enjoys golfing and spending time with his wife and three children.

 

Source:
http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20170515/NEWS/170519902

 

 

Image Credit

http://www.freeimages.com/photo/krankenhaus-1205171

 

 

See Our Related Video from our YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/user/ArnoldSmithPLLC/videos

 

 

See Our Related Blog Posts:

Mandatory Arbitration Clauses May Be A Thing Of The Past

Elder abuse and neglect a growing concern for families and society