Published on:

Attorney hopes “conservative” jury’s $1-million car-accident award is a game-changer

Charlotte Personal Injury Attorney Matthew R. Arnold of Arnold & Smith, PLLC answers the question “Should I trust the insurance adjuster?”

 

Damages are the dirty little secret in personal injury lawsuits—at least the typical insurance adjuster wants you to feel that way. Sure, the adjuster tells you, the driver who hit you was at fault and his insurance policy covered the accident, but what did you really lose?

Wrecked car Charlotte Injury Lawyer North Carolina Car Accident AttorneyYou lost a few hours of work, you hurt your back but the X-rays came back negative. You are as good as new—except you might need a few pain meds and an injection here and there when the pain flares up. Anyone can expect that—a little pain here and there is a part of life, and juries know that. A jury will not give you much for pain.

This is a game that insurance companies play on a massive scale to try to avoid and limit paying out claims. Cullman, Alabama attorney Johnny Berry said insurers have been playing that game for far too long in Cullman, which “has a reputation among insurance companies as a conservative place when it comes to juries ruling in personal injury cases,” according to the Cullman Times.

Berry’s client in a recent case—Joshua Culwell—was driving north on Alabama Highway 69 on February 10, 2012 when his vehicle was struck from behind by a vehicle driven by Thomas Clay Benson, III, according to the Times.

Benson was underinsured, which means the upper limits of his own insurance policy were not sufficient to cover the injuries and damage in the accident with Culwell. In those instances, if a person injured or damaged in an accident has purchased a policy of insurance that includes “uninsured or underinsured coverage,” the injured or damaged driver can file a claim against one’s own insurance policy to cover the difference between the policy limits of the at-fault driver and the amount of damage or injury to the injured driver.

Culwell made a claim against his own insurer, Progressive. At the time of the accident, the thirty-one-year old Culwell was disabled as a result of service in the Iraq War. His work at a local manufacturing firm is limited to eight-hours-per-day as a result of the low-back injury sustained in the February 10, 2012 accident. In addition, Culwell has to take pain medication and undergo four epidural steroid injections per year to treat residual low-back pain, according to the Times.

If Culwell’s case progressed in the manner in which other injury cases progress, the insurer—Progressive—had numerous opportunities to settle the claim. So often, however, insurers choose to pay a defense attorney to roll the dice in court instead of using the same money to pay an injured customer, hoping that in the long run a tough stance against injured parties will result in lower overall claims costs.

In Culwell’s case, that strategy backfired, as a jury in the otherwise “conservative” Cullman awarded Culwell $1 million.

Berry told the Times that he hopes the Culwell case is a game-changer in Cullman that leads to more reasonable pretrial settlements. Attorneys for Progressive, meanwhile, moved to set aside the jury’s verdict and reduce the judgment to the $75,000 limit on Culwell’s uninsured and underinsured coverage.

If you or someone you know has any questions regarding potential personal injury claims, feel free to contact the experienced personal injury attorneys at Arnold & Smith, PLLC in Charlotte, North Carolina for a free consultation. Call toll free at (955) 370-2828 or click here for additional resources.

 

 

About the Author

ARNOLD & SMITH LAW Matthew Arnold is a Managing Member of Arnold & Smith, PLLC, where he focuses on the areas of family law, divorce, child custody, child support, alimony and equitable distribution.

Mr. Arnold was raised in Charlotte, where he graduated from Providence Senior High School. He attended Belmont Abbey College, where he graduated cum laude, before attending law school at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill on a full academic scholarship.

A board-certified specialist in the practice of Family Law, Mr. Arnold is admitted to practice in all state courts in North Carolina, in the United States Federal Court for the Western District of North Carolina, in the North Carolina Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, and in the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia.

In his free time, Mr. Arnold enjoys golfing and spending time with his wife and three children.

 

 

Sources:

http://www.cullmantimes.com/news/cullman-jury-returns-m-verdict-in-personal-injury-case/article_d7a32ada-f607-11e4-99cf-07464883bc48.html

 

 

Image Credit

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tan_Accord.JPG

 

 

See Our Related Video from our YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/user/ArnoldSmithPLLC/videos

 

 

See Our Related Blog Posts:

Jury rejects cop’s claim for damages over spilled cup of free coffee

Jury awards $2.6 million to latest victim of “popcorn lung”